Back to Study Index

7-Scenario Design Comparison

The MediaVerse Studio Complex was evaluated across seven distinct acoustic design scenarios. Each represents a different approach to sound isolation, reverb control, and HVAC noise management. The final recommendation is a Hybrid approach that cherry-picks the best elements from each.

7
Scenarios Evaluated
S6
Recommended
34.4m2
Zone Area

Explore Each Approach

Click a scenario to view its details, trade-offs, and acoustic performance.

Advantages

    Drawbacks


      Multi-Axis Performance Overlay

      Select up to 3 scenarios to compare across 6 performance axes.

      Compare Scenarios

      Check up to 3 scenarios to overlay their performance polygons.


      Full Scenario Comparison

      All 7 scenarios compared across every key metric. Scenario 6 (Hybrid) is highlighted.


      Cost vs Performance

      Each scenario plotted by estimated cost and composite acoustic score. The shaded region highlights the best value zone.


      Why the Hybrid Approach Wins

      Scenario 6 is not a single design philosophy but a carefully assembled combination of the best elements from multiple scenarios, tailored to each room's specific needs.

      From Scenario 3: Full Isolation
      STC 65 Server Wall Construction
      The east wall facing B313's server room uses the maximum isolation build-up: double gypsum with Green Glue, 70mm studs with rockwool, plus the existing 100mm air gap. This blocks 55-65 dBA server noise to inaudible levels.
      From Scenario 5: HVAC Priority
      5-Run Silencer System
      Dedicated duct silencers with graduated attenuation: 40 dB for VO Live Run A (NC-12), 25 dB shared trunk Run B + 15 dB branch Run B1 for Control (NC-18), 10 dB branch Run B2 for Editing (NC-25), and 25 dB Run C for Video Studio (NC-18). Low terminal velocities prevent regenerated noise.
      From Scenario 2: VO Optimized
      NC-20 VO Live Focus
      The VO Live room receives the highest acoustic priority: triple-pane observation window (STC 50), full bass trap coverage, 70% wall absorption, and the tightest RT60 target (0.15-0.25s).
      From Scenario 4: Budget Smart
      Cost-Effective Editing Suite Walls
      The Editing Suite, being the least acoustically critical room (NC-35), uses single-layer gypsum partitions (STC 40) rather than expensive double-layer builds. This saves cost where it matters least.

      Weighted Scoring Analysis

      Five criteria weighted by project priority. Each scenario scored 1-10. Weighted totals confirm the Hybrid approach as the optimal choice.

      Recommendation

      Scenario 6 (Hybrid) achieves the highest weighted score of 8.25, delivering near-maximum acoustic performance while keeping costs 30-40% below the Full Isolation and Future-Proof scenarios. It is the recommended design for the MediaVerse Studio Complex.

      SSOT Version: --
      ← Back to Index ↑ Back to Top